Featured success casesfrom Law Firm Tong.
Tong represented the suspect in this case and successfully fought the charges against him, resulting in an acquittal. The suspect was charged with embezzlement for failing to account for sales proceeds from a military store. However, Law Firm Tong's defense emphasized that the suspect was an independent business owner, the proceeds belonged to him, and the account garnishment made settlement impossible. In the end, the investigating agency decided that the proceeds belonged to the suspect and that the settlement issue was merely a civil debt relationship.
Tong represented the suspect in this case and strategized a legal defense that resulted in an acquittal. The suspect was accused of sexual assault, but Tong refuted the accuser's claims of memory loss, and used the police's lack of initial investigation and CCTV evidence to discredit the accuser's allegations. In the end, the prosecution dropped the case due to lack of evidence to prove the defendant's intent.
The client was breathalyzed after arriving at an acquaintance's home, but claimed he had not been drinking when he drove the vehicle. There was no CCTV at the scene, and witnesses stated that the client did not have time to consume alcohol after driving, which worked against him. Tong highlighted the procedural shortcomings of the breath test, reconstructed the time of the client's consumption of alcohol and the circumstances of the scene in detail, and continued to argue the deficiencies of the police investigation, noting that the police officers did not properly verify the client's excuses at the time of the breath test. As a result, the court found that there was insufficient direct evidence to support the DUI charge and dismissed the case.
In this case, our client was accused of causing injury to a police officer by striking him in the head during a police arrest after being caught driving under the influence. The investigating authorities were of the opinion that the offense of wounding was established, but Tong prepared a thorough legal response from the beginning of the case. We thoroughly reviewed the credibility of the injury certificate and pointed out that the certificate relied on the victim's subjective appeal. We also argued that the client had no intention of causing injury and that the physical contact with the police was accidental. We carefully analyzed the court's precedents and presented evidence that did not meet the requirements for establishing the crime of injury, which was accepted by the court and played a crucial role in the client's acquittal. As a result, Tong's strategic and meticulous legal response was an important factor in the client's acquittal.
Tong represented Mr. A in this case, and its strategic and successful legal response led to a significant outcome. Mr. A was accused of corruption under the Specific Economic Crimes Aggravated Punishment Act (embezzlement) in connection with the 10 billion won illegal loan case. Law Firm Tong achieved an important result in the 10 Billion KRW Illegal Loan Case, where the arrest warrant was dismissed under the Specified Economic Crimes Aggravated Punishment Act (embezzlement). The suspect, Mr. A, cooperated with all investigations and strongly convinced the court that there was no possibility of flight or destruction of evidence due to physical health issues.
